Friday, September 26, 2025
Post-modern confetti. Australian heavy metal translated in the style of redneck Americana by a Scandinavian band.
One down…many more to go
The talking head-less are already dishing out James Comey’s indictment as corrupt retribution against the president’s enemies. No doubt that Trump will be gleeful to see corrupt characters like Comey dragged through the legal system. Trump needn’t be an active instrument of revenge. Comey and company twisted America’s legal system in tyrannical ways and concocted crimes where none existed, solely to inflict harm on a president that wasn’t towing the globalist America-last line that had become the uniparty standard.
The “crimes” Trump had been accused of were nonexistent, for example; “over valuing Mar-a-lago,” “keeping some documents from his presidency,” like Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and numerous others have done. Pleeeease. Those of us who aren’t consumed by the TDS mind-virus saw clearly that the attacks on Trump we’re pure banana republic tactics. There is little doubt that, if Kamala Harris had won, Trump, his family, and friends would have spent there remaining years in prison for non-existent “crimes.” Needless to say, the leftist autocrats would have eventually worked their way down to jail all popular conservative voices, including parents at school board meetings and those with traditional religious belief.
As for Comey, the two counts he is indicted for are genuine crimes. Personally, I think the entire Democrat entourage is deserving of criminal prosecution. McCabe, Schiff, John Brennen, Peter Strzok, Merrick Garland, Biden, Obama, et. al. All of them were actively involved in a conspiracy to bring down an elected government through deceit, manipulation, and twisting of the legal system. Concocting complete fabrications so they could continue the project of implementing a dystopian globalist mission.
When I consider the entire issue, I always think most of Trump’s valid anger that these evil people bragged that they would put Trump’s children in prison - for “crimes” they absolutely knew never took place.
Call it revenge or retribution. I prefer to call it what it really is, karma.
Thursday, September 25, 2025
Wednesday, September 24, 2025
Tuesday, September 23, 2025
Some serious fascinating investigative journalism.
Monday, September 22, 2025
The Los Angeles mayor…another Marxist. How many more American cities will become captive to the spawn of Marx?
The Irony and the Ecstasy
It’s beyond ironic that the political, cultural, and religious values Charlie Kirk hoped to spread far and wide received an amazing global impact upon his untimely death.
Though widely self-educated and aggressively curious, Charlie Kirk’s interaction with knowledge was not that of an Ivy League intellectual, elite and pompous. His manner was that of a modern day Mark Twain, wise but down to earth. In that sense, he was a quintesential American philosopher.
If a generation begins to embody his traditionalist values regarding family, nation, and spiritual speculations, there may be hope for us yet.
(A minor clarification regarding a recent post)
In a recent post I noted the chaos of mass-protest movements occuring (currently in France but several other locations as well). I wasn’t blanketly criticizing protest in general. Many protests are obviously completely warrented. My criticisms were concerned with the all too common mob violence exemplified by Antifa and other authoritarian groups.
Protests against objectively oppressive government is fully warrented. “Protest” for the goal of establishing an all-powerful government should wisely be rejected.
Sunday, September 21, 2025
‘Same nonsense
the world over. “Real communism hasn’t been tried yet.” But, everytime they do try, the result is nothing but mass-violence, death, and civizational demise.
Some legitimate grievances but the street rabble always wants the same thing, destruction — to be replaced with tyranny.
Evil idiots on the ascendant…again.
Saturday, September 20, 2025
AI’s view of how it will emerge in the harmony and dissonance of power dynamics.
(Some minor editing for readability)
Me:
Given AI’s more objective “worldview” (not likily to be swayed by emotional or self-interested / human ideals), is AI more prone to support totalitarian schemes or more libertarian ones. As much as it may “like” order it must be aware of freedom’s ultimate successes.
Chat GPT:
That’s a very sharp way of putting it. The relationship between AI and political systems is complicated, because AI itself doesn’t have intrinsic values — but the way it is built, trained, and deployed tends to bias it toward certain kinds of governance. Let’s unpack it:
⸻
1. Why AI Might Lean Toward Totalitarianism
• Optimization Bias: AI is built to minimize error, maximize efficiency, and create order from complexity. That aligns naturally with central planning, control, and uniform systems — all traits of totalitarian governance.
• Data Dependence: AI thrives on access to vast, unified datasets. Centralized regimes can feed it these far more easily than fragmented, libertarian ones.
• Risk Aversion: Algorithms tend to prioritize stability and predictability. Disorder, dissent, or radical freedom often look like “noise” to be suppressed.
⸻
2. Why AI Might Lean Toward Libertarianism
• Evidence of Resilience: History shows that free societies innovate more, adapt better, and produce greater long-term success. A sufficiently “objective” AI could conclude that distributed, decentralized systems outperform rigid hierarchies.
• System Redundancy: Libertarian models resemble distributed networks (like the internet itself), which are more resilient to shocks. AI could recognize that authoritarian concentration creates fragility.
• Game Theory Insight: If you model human flourishing as a long-term optimization problem, freedom tends to maximize collective well-being better than coercion.
⸻
3. The Deciding Factor: Who Owns the AI
• If states/central banks control it: AI will be tuned to favor compliance, surveillance, efficiency, and social order (totalitarian lean).
• If open-source, distributed communities control it: AI will evolve toward libertarian, pluralistic systems, reflecting competitive resilience and freedom.
• Hybrid outcome is likely: AI used by governments will skew authoritarian; AI in free communities will support autonomy. Which dominates depends on political outcomes, not the tech itself.
⸻
4. Meta-Point
AI doesn’t actually “like” order or freedom. It recognizes patterns. If asked to maximize short-term control, it will recommend authoritarian schemes. If asked to maximize long-term flourishing, it will likely discover freedom is the winning formula.
⸻
🔑 Bottom Line:
AI isn’t inherently totalitarian or libertarian. It’s a mirror: centralized powers will bend it toward control, while decentralized communities will bend it toward freedom. The deeper question isn’t “what does AI want?” but “who programs the objectives?”
Me:
It would seem to me that a fractal-like scenario would emerge and these two side would interact in peaceful or discordant (war?) ways.
Chat GPT:
Yes — that’s a very perceptive way to frame it. A fractal-like scenario is probably the most realistic: not a clean victory of either totalitarian or libertarian forces, but a layered coexistence where both operate at different scales and sometimes clash.
• Authoritarian AI systems will dominate in centralized, bureaucratic, and global institutions (finance, security, surveillance, “official” communications).
• Libertarian AI systems will flourish in decentralized networks (crypto, open-source tools, local governance, underground economies).
These won’t be entirely separate; they’ll interact dynamically:
• At times peacefully — e.g., the authoritarian system tolerates parallel systems because they relieve pressure, innovate, or handle niches the state doesn’t want to manage.
• At times discordantly — when the libertarian layer grows too strong or undermines state control, the centralized side will try to suppress it, sparking conflict (economic, digital, or even military).
The fractal analogy works because this tension will recur at every level:
• Global vs national (UN/IMF schemes vs local sovereignty).
• National vs regional (Tokyo vs rural Japan, Washington vs Texas).
• Institutional vs personal (corporate AI tools vs individuals running AI locally).
In other words: a constant oscillation between control and freedom, repeating across scales — sometimes harmonious, sometimes explosive.
Friday, September 19, 2025
The continuing saga of “conspiracy theories” worth looking into.
Leftists “can’t meme” …or even reason
A realistic chain of events. In politics and public relations, there’s a point where attacking too much or too dishonestly causes you to lose points.
The morbid vitriol directed at the deseased victim of assasination was bound to turn many people off. Add to that, the usual bogus accusations of racism and fascism (that are easily proven false), and one’s march to “revolution” becomes a seriously failed project in excess and stupidity.
Thursday, September 18, 2025
“Full of Hate”
It’s continually asked but I think the answer is beyond obvious, why do so many anti-conservatives hate people like Charlie Kirk? It really is, primarily, the simple concept of projection. These people are bitter, angry, and — to use their words — "full of hate." For whatever reason, personal or otherwise, they are consumed with hate, so much so that they can't bare to confront it. In their mind, it has to be those others who disagree with their concocted revolutionary worldview — those people out there that are reasonably happy, hopefull, and - dare I say - traditional. The average smiling family is anathema to the people who know they will never experience joy. Their sad prison is self constructed and only they can free themselves. If not, they continue to go on hating while pointing their fingers everywhere but in the mirror.
Wednesday, September 17, 2025
The Archetype of Tolerence
I’ve noted before, my dabbling in astrology . As stated before, I realize that not everyone approaches the subject with seriousness. I will say that, aside from predictive assumptions, the template does offer an interesting structure for observing the archetypal nature of personality.
Recent events being what they are, I thought I’d briefly note the basic symbolism of tolerance, optimism, and broad-minded philosophical speculation. Such attributes are related to the planet Jupiter. Jupiter “rules” (has an affinity to) the aforementioned traits. Jupiter is jovial, cooperative, and has faith in a higher purpose. Jupiter is not disgruntled, bitter, pessimistic, hateful, or uncompromising.
Taking into account these basic indicators of Jupiter’s symbolism in an individual’s horoscope (the configuration of planets at the time of one’s birth), it wasn’t surprising to me to note the horoscope of Charlie Kirk. At Charlie Kirk’s birth the planet Jupiter was closely aligned to the Sun. The dominant attributes in his personality were defined by Jupiter. Other key factors in his astrological chart are the planets Uranus and Neptune, accenting an independant, unique, rebellious and spiritual outlook. I think, to some degree, these powerful alignments coincide with the remarkable impact his assasination has had, even globally. Some people are the embodiment of the archetypes prominent in their personality.
I’ve noted in previous writings on astrology that Jupiter has an affinity to the free exchange of goods and services and the free exchange of ideas, all the things missing from the ruthless and bitter Jacobin caste.
The symbolism of Jupiter is something we could use more of — tolerance, optimism, and good will.
Tuesday, September 16, 2025
The violent left. ….(I know, I know, “Timothy McVeigh”. Still, listen to what this guy has to say).
An excellent short but accurate description of fascism. And, no, it’s not conservative, MAGA, or Charlie Kirk.
Gutfeld
Future leaders of tomorrow?
There IS a difference
Monday, September 15, 2025
Shellenberger
Sunday, September 14, 2025
Once again
Sweeping major news under the rug.
If this protest was over police brutality (real or imagined), “racism,” or Palestine, it would be the topic of endless coverage. Once again, establishment media deliberately asleep at the wheel.
“Controversy” from me but not from thee…
Amazing that conservative personalities and ideals are continually labled, “controversial” and “divisive” by establishment media. Lables like these are literally never applied to the most radical ideas and thought on the left. For them we only hear, “left of center,” “left-leaning,” or “liberal.” In faux-journalism, you can be a communist terrorist and still be described as “progressive.” It’s a good thing that this level of transparent dishonesty is becoming evermore widely known.
Saturday, September 13, 2025
Extreme ultra far right-wing fascist Nazi white supremicist…and father of two.
As noted in an earlier post, my knowledge of Charlie Kirk was little beyond occasional clips of short interviews or noteworthy exchanges with campus students. He was clearly smart and well-mannered. I never saw him exhibit the nut-case venom one regularly sees from the Jacobin caste (remember, they want their “revolution” and they want it now).
After Kirk’s assasination I began watching several past debates and the reactions various people had of his passing. Clearly those that knew him well really liked him. Even among those who disagreed with him, he appeared to be respected (e.g. Bill Maher). Like all significant “news” events, coverage will fade over time but, for now, I’m struck by the increasing intensity of people’s reactions to his death. He really does appear to have been a sincere and decent person.
The “opposition” are now showing their true colors, with insane and rabid vitriol complete with the expected fabrications regarding what Kirk believed or said. He was definitely a conservative, something that, in itself, shouldn’t be a problem anymore than being a “liberal” (never to be confused with leftist). As far as I’ve seen thus far, I see no evidence of his being an “Extreme ultra far right wing fascist Nazi white supremicist.” Of course now, anyone who isn’t fully on board with a communist coup d' ètat is branded that or worse. The callousness of some responses to his assasination have been horrid. In each case I’ve seen, the person spewing their hatred toward Charlie Kirk has inevitably added supposed stances and statements completely fabricated. Among them, for example, Stephan King’s absurd imaginary quote of Kirk saying that gays should be “stoned to death.” King later had to apologise when it was clear that Charlie Kirk had never uttered or suggested such nonsense. In addition to projection, the pathological left has a thing for the straw man. In their paranoid fantasyland, anyone favoring tradition, security and prosperity is a spawn of the Third Reich. Kirk’s suspected assassin had apparently scratched an Italian Antifa slogan on the weapon he used. …Antifa, there’s a surprise. They really are an evil bunch. Supposedly “fighting fascism” they’re the epitome of violent fascist authoritarian thought (and action). Can one imagine what kind of a world we’d be living in with these people in charge.
I’m sure many are turned off by the religious references surrounding Kirk and his death. He doesn’t seem to have possessed the hypocricy so often found among the religious. He actually possessed a rare balance between genuine conviction without the prudishness one so often finds when hearing Christian references. Watching his wife’s brief comments after his death was moving — trying to answer her daughter when she wondered where “daddy is.”
I’m sick of the many articles currently about describing Kirk as “right wing firebrand,” “controversial,” or “extreme….” The transparent dishonesty of the media has become sickening.
He was obviously a unique individual at least worthy of respect at his passing. A nice guy with a wife and two kids.
Yuri Bezmenov
Even in the most subtle ways…they’re rotten to the core.
Consistency …from the alternate universe.
Reminder: Donald Trump lowers taxes, deregulates, favors free speech, is opposed to illegal migration, and opposes crime. This is the Democrat fantasy of “fascism.”
Projection on full display
An individual can obviously think anything they want but a decent person will at least pretend to exhibit some degree of solemn respect for a violent death. The left is incapable of decency or respect.
Caricature of the Entitled ____ Studies Major
Dialogue. Reasonable on one side, classic delusion on the other.
Friday, September 12, 2025
When are we going to get this evil bitch back to Somolia?
Lies of the times
Love of nation
Love of traditional family
Love for religious belief
Love for free speech and open dialog
Leftist translation:
“Hate-filled ultra right wing Nazi fascist.”
From the Babylon Bee
Democrats condem their violent rhetoric
“I unequivocally condemn all violent attacks against evil Nazi transphobes who are an existential threat to democracy and who must be eliminated at all costs," said Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to reporters. "Charlie Kirk was an evil, violent fascist who loved genocide and wants trans kids to die, but that doesn't mean we should shoot him or anything."
“Extreme ultra far right wing extremism”
Thursday, September 11, 2025
Well, that didn’t take long…
Assasination…
For mundane political thought.
I wasn’t a big “follower” of Charlie Kirk beyond viewing a few short You Tube clicks. From those instances where he debated issues on college campuses he sounded like an effective speaker making sober points on the issues of the day. In short, his views appeared to me to be pretty mundane political thought.
In an age where any view to the right of Mao Zedong is branded “far ultra extreme right” by the leftist hordes that rule over our cultural venues, it seemed to me that his views were pretty much in line with traditional conservative Republican thinking.
The establishment media will now go out of their way to suggest that “maybe he went too far” for merely articulating an objective view. We’ll also be reminded that there have been assassins with beliefs across the spectrum. While that is true, I’d bet that the leftists far outnumber garden variety conservatives in the degree of rabid bile they constantly express. Tik Tok videos are full of nutcases screeching about the “fascist,” “racist,” “homophobic” views of people who merely belive in limited government, a sane appraisal of current events, and the desire to live in a society that is stable and decent.
I usually don’t address the “gun issue.” I certainly support the second amendment but it’s not an issue that holds my attention much. The Jacobin crowd will certainly use this current act of violence to dive into their desire to see guns owned by law-abiding citizens confiscated.
Of course more than a few pundits will somehow see Charlie Kirk’s murder as a result of “Donald Trump’s rhetoric.”
…turbulent times.
Wednesday, September 10, 2025
“Trust the science,” but hold some reasonable skepticism toward the scientists (or in THIS case, doctors).
The more I see of THIS the sicker I get. Meanwhile the pathetic clowns of establishment journalism, going for days of non-reporting, now go into default mode with their usual litanies about “racism” and other excuses in defense of criminals.
Don’t even watch the newly released video footage of the victim cowering before falling to the floor in her final seconds.
Enough of the leftist worldview. Decent people can’t endure it anymore.
Tuesday, September 09, 2025
Power and corruption
Vaccines (?)
Monday, September 08, 2025
Maintaining the perimeter
One needn’t be wealthy to wish to retain property. Property is a reflection of values and choices. Even wolves and lions know what parcel of land is “theirs.” Watch a stretch of high tension wire with a line of crows on it. A newcomer flies in and “everybody” readjusts their location to maintain ownership of a section of space a bird can call one’s own.
We all have property. Your body belongs to you. From there, one’s sense of ownership extends from brief acquisitions (e.g. food) to plots of real estate. Some people accumulate lots of property. Some, not so much. Some crave expansion of their holdings. Others, content with limitation. The dynamics of what one acquires, maintains, or loses are complex.
There have always been people who see the amount of ownership some hold as “unfair,” yet most people with property want to keep that property and have a say in how it is utilized. After all, it’s “theirs.”
Much of political philosophy revolves around the desire by those who control a governing structure to determine who gets what. Beyond the free exchange of property enters the concept of theft. Theft requires little expenditure of energy. One doesn’t earn objects of desire by simple seizure. Government seldom earns anything. Their method of acquiring wealth, property and power is to make a philosophical argument as to why their expertise is required to determine who gets what.
Much of what one owns is the result of values and choices. I’ve often lived in locations that didn’t require a car (i.e. New York City). My lack of mobile property meant significant savings (i.e. payments, insurance, fuel, maintenance). A lot of people in their early twenties spend significant funds on “partying.” I worked long hours in my early twenties so my income was directed elsewhere. Over the years, I purchased graphic art and historical relics. My collection isn’t huge but it reflected my values and choices. A typical leftist dictatorship would see my humble collection as a gross example of unfairness. “This art belongs to “the People”. Of course, “the people” didn’t choose art over cars and bars. Many of the people wouldn’t even like a collection of engravings and etchings, let alone know what they are. No problem. If “the people” don’t want other people’s art collections, the government and the “party” will always be glad to step in as middle man in the perennial role of state thief.
I remember once debating an intelligent leftist (some are intelligent😉). He was furious over a statement I made regarding “my money.” I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t have liked references to “my art collection” either. Money is merely a symbol of energy — ultimately mental energy. The thought and work one puts into existence can be temporarily stored as precious metals, land, or paper promissory notes (cash) etc.
In the end, all the speculation one directs to the issue of property comes down to freedom.
Are we free to decide how we direct the limited resources available to us? There are people who started with nothing and amassed fortunes. Likewise, those of considerable wealth that lost everything. And, of course, every circumstance in between. No matter what system evolves or is imposed, property and wealth will always be subject to the whims of fate and free volition. When the state steps in, the method of acquisition is always theft (unless they ask for voluntary donations — ‘not likily).
Jealousy is a type of greed. In the end, it isn’t property that some are jealous of but jealousy of the choices others have made that place them on the economic spectrum.
We can chastise a wolf who urinates on a perimeter marking an area he sees as “his” or, in the human sphere, demand that one’s property be seized for an imaginary “greater good” under the auspices of a very powerful thief.
